is about creating choices in teams, or different types of power relations between people, such as the distribution of resources or position. The branch of a scientific discipline that studies politics and government is mentioned as politics.
It can be used entirely in the context of a bargaining and non-violent "political solution", or described as "the art or science of government", but in addition, it usually carries a negative connotation.
The idea has been identified in a variety of ways in which completely different approaches have fundamentally different perspectives on whether they should be used on a large or limited scale, through empirical or normative observation, and on whether conflict or cooperation is necessary for this or not.
A variety of ways in which the unity of the region is pervasive in politics, which embraces the promotion of your political beliefs among people, negotiation with different political topics, law-making, and the exercise of internal and external power, along with the war against adversaries. Politics is practiced at a variety of social levels, from clans and tribes in ancient societies, through modern local governments, corporations, and institutions to sovereign states, to the international level.
In modern nation-states, people usually write political parties to represent their concepts. Members of the celebration usually agree to take a similar position on many problems and comply with the support of identical changes to the law as well as the same leaders. Affiliate elections are sometimes a competition between completely different parties.
The form of government may be a framework that defines acceptable political methods within society.
The history of political thought can be copied back to early antiquity, with pioneering works such as Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Policy within the West, and the Political Confucius and Arthashastra manuscripts of Shanakia within the East.
derivation
The roots of English politics go back to Aristotle's classical work name, Politica, which introduced the Greek term. During the mid-15th century, Aristotle's composition will be introduced in early modern English which may become politics in modern English.
The single 1st echt policy in English in 1430, returning from Central French politics - itself takes from politics, a Latin from Greek πολιτικός from πολίτης and πόλις.
Definitions
Harold Laswell: "Who gets what, when, and how"
David Easton: "The formal allocation of values to society"
Vladimir Lenin: "The most targeted expression of the economy"
Otto von Bismarck: "The ability to choose permanently at every moment, in permanent dynamic things, the smallest amount of harmful, and primarily useful"
Bernard Crick: "A distinctive set of rules where people act through institutional procedures to resolve differences"
Adrian Liftwicz: "Includes all activities of cooperation, negotiation, and conflict within and between communities"
Approach
There are many ways in which approaching politics has been conceived.
Extensive and restrictive
Adrian Levitwich has diverged in views on supported politics but is deeply constrained by their perception of what "political" calculations are. In-depth reading sees politics as a gift across the realm of human social relations, while restricted reading constrains it to certain contexts.
For example, through a lot of restrictive means, politics can also be seen primarily as related to governance, while a feminist perspective may argue that sites historically viewed as apolitical should be seen as more political. This latter position is encapsulated in the expression "political personality", which calls into question the distinction between non-public and public problems.
Politics can also be determined by the employment of power, as Henry Martin argued with Robert A. Dahl.
Ethics and realism
Some views on policy read it {empirically|through empirical observation|by mistake associated with experience} as an exercise of power, while others see it as an occasion with a normative basis. This distinction has been known as the distinction between political ethics and political realism. For ethicists, politics is inextricably linked to morality and is at its extremes in utopian thinking.
While in line with the physiologist Creek, "politics is that how the unity of the region of free societies has ruled. Politics is politics and different types of unity of the region of government is something else." Distinguishedly, for realists, portrayed by the likes of a statesman, philosopher, and Harold Laswell, politics is based on the employment of power, regardless of the ends pursued. While for Carl Schmidt, the essence of politics is to distinguish between "friend" and foe.
This can be in contrast to much of the collaborative views of politics by Aristotle and Crick. HaoManifestations
petition
Sit
Strike
Tax resistance
voting
Political Values
democracy
Democracy can be a system of process conflicts in which outcomes depend on what participants do, but no single force controls what happens and its outcomes. Uncertainty about the results is inherent in democracy.
Democracy makes all forces struggle again and again to value their interests and transfers power from teams of individuals to groups of bases.
Among modern political theorists, there are 3 competitive concepts of democracy: collective, thoughtful, and radical.
Synthesis
The theory of collective democracy claims that the goal of democratic processes is to seek voters' preferences, blending them to determine what social policies society must adopt.
Therefore, proponents of this reading argue that democratic participation should be aimed primarily at suffrage, wherever first-vote politics are imposed.
There are different forms of collective democracy. Under reductionism, democracy can be a state system where voters have given groups of political leaders the right to issue a decree holding periodic elections.
According to this simple concept, voters cannot and may not "judge" the result, for example, in most problems, most often, they do not need clear views or their views are not reasonable. Joseph Alois Schumpeter expressed this reading wonderfully in his book Market Economy, Socialism, and Democracy.
Modern reductionist proponents portray William H. Riker, Adam Przeworsky, and Richard Posner.
According to the idea of direct democracy, on the contrary, voters must vote directly, not through their representatives, on legislative proposals. Proponents of direct democracy offer various reasons to support this reading. Political activism is valuable in itself, it serves to socialize and educate voters, and modern participation will rein in powerful elites.
More importantly, voters do not govern themselves unless they decide laws and policies directly.
Governments can tend to provide laws and policies that stand on the edge of the views of the average electorate – with [*fr1] to their left as well as the partner to their right. This cannot be a great outcome because it represents the work of self-interest and somewhat unaccountable political elites vying for votes.
Anthony Downs suggests that ideological political parties are necessary to act as mediators between individuals and governments. Downs ordered this reading in his 1957 book The Theory of Democracy.
Robert A. D. argues that the basic democratic principle is that once it involves binding collective choices, everyone in a highly political society has the right to own his/her interests/hers that tend to think equally.
The term polyarchy is used to see the societies in which |in which it exists| Within it} is a subtle set of institutions and procedures that are seen as leading to such a democracy. At the beginning and above all among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections that are used to choose representatives of the United Nations agency and then manage all or most of the general policy of society.
However, these multi-sequence actions may not produce a full democracy if, for example, the economic situation prevents political participation.
Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that "democracy can be a fundamental ideal, not just a procedural one."
Deliberative
Deliberative democracy is based on the idea that democracy is a government by deliberation. In contrast to collective democracy, thoughtful democracy holds that for democratic advocacy to be legitimate, it must be preceded by genuine deliberations, not just the compilation of preferences that occurs on the ballot. Real deliberations are deliberations between decision-makers that are free from distortions of unequal political power, such as the power that the decision-maker obtains through economic wealth or support for the differences of interest.
If decision-makers cannot reach an agreement when deliberating on a proposal, they vote on the proposal using a variety of ideologies.
extreme
Radical democracy is based on the idea of hierarchical and repressive power relations that exist in society.
The role of democracy is to create and challenge visible relationships by allowing discrimination, dissent, and antagonism in decision-making processes.
equal rights
Equality can be a situation in which all people at intervals of the chosen society or group have a fixed status, in particular social and economic status, as well as the protection of human rights and dignity, equal access to social products, and binding social services. Moreover, it should additionally embody health equality, economic equality, and alternative social guarantees. Social equality needs the absence of persons or class boundaries imposed by law as well as the absence of motivation for discrimination.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق